On this page
Is the Booklet System Right for Me?
The exam booklet system is not a universal approach but works optimally under specific conditions. An honest assessment of your situation helps avoid disappointments and maximize success.
Framework Conditions
Learning behavior: If your students tend to cram at the last minute, the system provides an effective countermeasure.
Course size: The technical effort is worthwhile starting from 20 students. For smaller groups, analog note collection may be more efficient.
Assessment format: The system was developed for written exams; we have no experience with other assessment formats.
Required Commitment
Teaching methods: Be prepared to invest 2–3 class sessions in teaching learning and note-taking techniques. Without this guidance, many students will only superficially copy content.
Clear communication: To adequately ensure the exam principle of equal opportunity, clearly communicated rules are required that are consistently enforced.
Why the Effort is Worthwhile
For students, the system means continuous learning instead of exam stress, improved methodological skills, and a reliable exam aid. Instructors have an incentive to pose less superficial exam questions, receive informal feedback on learning progress during the semester, and have low ongoing effort after initial setup and method instruction.
Implementation
Technical Preparation
The Booklet Tool helps generate booklet pages with Moodle and Ilias. It runs without installation on Windows, macOS, and Linux. After downloading, you should perform a test run with sample data to verify functionality.
LMS integration: In Moodle, import the preconfigured course template to create assignments for each booklet page with consistent submission deadlines. In Ilias, create structured exercise folders and set access rights so that only individual submissions are visible.
Organizational Planning
First, establish the essential parameters: maximum number of pages (e.g., 15), submission rhythm, and implementation of the handwriting requirement. Clarify any legal aspects with the examination office and statute department, especially for initial implementation. If other instructors are also planning booklet systems, coordinate submission deadlines to reduce student workload.
Methodological Introduction
The success of the system depends on the quality of method instruction. Plan to teach note-taking techniques such as the Cornell method during 2–3 class sessions at the beginning of the semester. Emphasize that quality is more important than aesthetics and that the time spent per booklet page should be in the range of 30-60 minutes.
The first booklet page submission should only occur after two weeks to give students time to adjust. Regularly discuss sample pages (after obtaining prior consent) in class to demonstrate different approaches.
Semester Routine
During the semester, the focus is on consistency and quality assurance. Maintain a regular submission rhythm and set reasonable submission times (class start instead of midnight). Conduct random checks for rule violations and create test booklets early to identify technical problems in time.
Exam Preparation
Automated booklet creation should be performed at least one week before the exam to allow time to respond to technical problems. Check all submitted pages for rule compliance if necessary and organize printing in A5 format with 300 dpi resolution. Adjust your exam questions if needed: less factual knowledge, more understanding and application.
Rules and Quality Assurance
Clear rules are essential for equal opportunity and fairness.
Handwriting Requirement
The most important rule from our perspective is a handwriting requirement: All content must be written in the students’ own handwriting, whether on paper or tablet. We permit direct transcriptions from slides or websites, collaboratively created content (as long as each person writes themselves), and one printed heading per page (because many note-taking apps automatically insert this).
Format and Scope
Page count: Up to 15 pages per semester, typically one per week starting from the second lecture week. Late joiners can also submit two pages in week 2.
Technical format: Input in any size, automatic scaling to A5 for printing with 300 dpi resolution.
Deadlines and Enforcement
Consistency: Submission deadlines are strictly enforced to ensure equal opportunity. Technical problems are at the students’ risk.
Rule violations: Pages with someone else’s handwriting or screenshots invalidate the booklet. Students can have problematic pages removed until the last submission deadline to avoid taking the exam without a booklet (see Student Template ). Preventive education and random checks help identify such problems early.
Practical Implementation
Automation and Workflow
The Booklet Tool helps convert page-oriented submissions into person-oriented booklets, i.e., it automatically merges all pages of an examinee into one PDF; additionally, a cover page is generated.
Exam Organization
Booklet creation should be completed at least one week before the exam, including quality control and sorting by name. Ideally, students can view their booklets electronically in advance for verification. On the exam day, only the distributed booklets are permitted – no changes or additions. The booklets are collected with the exams and archived for retake exams.
Alternative Approaches and Adaptations
Small Courses (up to 20 students)
Analog note collection: Students submit handwritten notes in the in-person class and receive them back during the exam. Advantages: No printing needed, no technical infrastructure, very flexible. Disadvantages: Attendance required, manual administration
Hybrid Assessment Formats
Part 1 without aids: Basic knowledge and comprehension questions (50% of points). Part 2 with booklet: Application and transfer tasks (50% of points). Advantage: Prevents complete dependence on the booklet, ensures basic knowledge
We describe further alternative approaches on a separate page:
Additional Variants (not yet tested)
- Bonus points for quality: e.g., 10% of total grade for good pages
- Peer review: Mutual assessment with revision opportunity
- Lecture notes: Collection during in-person sessions
Additional Resources
We provide a reference and ready-made texts for communication with students.
Contact
Prof. Dr. Dominik Herrmann
Chair Privacy and Security in Information Systems
University of Bamberg, 96045 Bamberg
Chair Privacy and Security in Information Systems
University of Bamberg
96045 Bamberg
dh.psi@uni-bamberg.de | +49 951 863-2661
uni-mal-anders.de | LinkedIn
Prof. Dr. Dominik Herrmann
Chair Privacy and Security in Information Systems,
University of Bamberg, 96045 Bamberg
dh.psi@uni-bamberg.de
+49 951 863-2661
uni-mal-anders.de | LinkedIn